This is the thirty-seventh and
final installment to my Coronavirus series, which began two years ago on this
date. This installment serves as an index to the entire series.
I use the word “indexical” not
only to suggest the index herein, but as a reflection of the word’s actual meaning: a linguistic
expression whose reference can shift from context to context. That is what this
series has done over time; as the context has continued to evolve, not a single
installment has ever been written in stone, and all of them should be subject
to evaluation based on the contexts in which they were first composed.
What could be more dialectical than that?
As a kind of personal
“journal,” this series has been as much a therapeutic exercise in dealing with an
unfathomable number of deaths in my beloved city of New York as it was an
attempt to come to grips with the many issues raised by COVID-19 and the
policies adopted in response to it. Ultimately, it asked more questions than it
answered.
As dates go, this one has an additional degree of irony. Fifty years ago today, “The Godfather” premiered at the Loew’s State Theatre in New York City to much fanfare. The film, and its later re-edited incarnation (with its two sequels) as a chronological epic, remains one of my all-time favorites. Not for its famous tropes or its classic quotes, but for its illustration, in painstaking detail, of how the inversion of values destroys the human soul. The characters therein ostensibly try to preserve that which they value through nefarious means that lead to the loss of those values—and of life itself.
While that 1972 film drives home this point in the context of warfare among mob ‘families’, their legions of hitmen pale in comparison to the warfare perpetuated by states across the world, which have perfected the art of mass murder in a way that would make even the most ruthless of Mafia Dons blush.
In war, even in those wars fought against horrific
forces of oppression, there are always consequences, both intended and
unintended, that forever become a part of the political landscape. For example,
the defeat of the Axis powers in World War II left in its wake the
consolidation of a U.S. military-industrial
complex and a national
security state and ongoing policies of “perpetual war for
perpetual peace”—whether it was called the Cold War,
the War
on Terror, or the War on Drugs.
But states and their ruling classes, ever responsible for wars, have also
exploited disasters—natural or man-made—to expand their powers, suppress civil
liberties, and destroy the fabric of social and economic life.
That is why
libertarians have been gallant opponents of state expansion, knowing full well
that state actors rarely act in good faith and that governmental overreach especially
during emergencies is not easily rolled back. Such emergencies have been exploited
throughout history in ways that tap into people’s anxieties and fears while
augmenting their obedience to a class of politically connected “experts.”
I am a libertarian—a dialectical one at that. Which means that while I retain my libertarian distrust of political and economic elites, I fully understand that we live under a certain set of institutional constraints and that the real conditions that exist give human beings highly limited and imperfect tools to deal with emergencies as they arise.
I am also a native New Yorker. I have experienced much
heartache in this city, from 9/11
to Superstorm
Sandy. And I have witnessed, with my own eyes, the deaths
of countless fellow New Yorkers at the height of the COVID pandemic. I was
utterly aghast when many of my libertarian friends were branding the pandemic an
“exaggeration” or worse, a “hoax”. There
has always been room to debate the effectiveness of this or that policy in
response to COVID. But the epidemic of denialism that swept
across libertarian circles—while neighbors to the right of me and neighbors to
the left of me were literally dropping dead—only compounded my sadness. Denialism
is not a strategy. It is an admission of defeat—that one has no
proposals to deal with an externality, whatever its scope or fatality rate.
***
I was recently asked a very
interesting and relevant question by my friend, Alexander Wade
Craig: “What context have
we lost in the changes COVID brought to our social lives that you think we are
1) better off for having lost, and 2) worse off for having lost?”
I
acknowledged that this was a very difficult question to answer. Even though
I’ve written 36 previous installments covering the pandemic and its
implications, it is going to take many years to truly understand COVID-19 and the
response to it—and the costs that each brought to both life and liberty. Still,
this event helped to illuminate notions that we are better off for having lost,
as well as notions that we are worse off for having lost—and these notions are
essentially two sides of the same coin:
1)
The spread of COVID-19 made it clearer than ever that the world is a global
community, interconnected in ways that cannot be altered by artificially
created borders. Given the ebb and flow of peoples across artificial boundaries
imposed by nation-states, we learned swiftly that a virus, like the people it
infects, knows no borders. What first shows up in Wuhan City, Hubei Province,
in China, spreads to the Korean peninsula, Australia, Canada, France, Italy,
the United States, Russia, Africa, and throughout the world. This is not a call
to close borders; it is simply an acknowledgment of the unavoidable interconnections
between peoples across the Earth. So, we’re better off for having lost the idea
that somehow people can be isolated from one another—a rather sobering lesson,
considering that the response to an infectious disease has typically been
lockdowns, quarantines, and other policies of separation.
2)
So, the other side of that coin introduces us to a whole litany of ‘separateness’:
distancing, mask-wearing, quarantining, and so forth. Hence, just as a global
pandemic illustrates that people cannot be hermetically sealed from one another
(a good thing), it simultaneously leads to efforts to do precisely that:
hermetically seal ourselves off from others. The effect of isolation (whether
it was chosen or coercively imposed) has been increased social alienation, a
rise in mental health problems, substance abuse, and overdose deaths. People of
all ages, from the very young to the very old, were deleteriously affected by
this isolation. I suspect that these effects will lessen over time, as the
COVID ‘crisis phase’ dissipates, but we are still worse off for having lost
that social connectedness for such a long period of time, no matter how
necessary it may have been for various people in various contexts.
Nathaniel
Branden once wrote: “We stand within an endless network of
relationships. Separation and connectedness are polarities, with each entailing
the other.” It’s very sad that so many people have learned the truth of this
principle in such a tragic way.
Here is a chronological index to all the installments in my Coronavirus series; unless there is some huge issue that needs to be addressed in some dramatically different way, I suspect that this installment, like the last one I wrote on 9/11 (for the twentieth anniversary of that day), will be the final installment in this series. And it’s fully in keeping with my friend Tom Knapp‘s “Prime Number Obsession”—that “all sets should consist of a prime number of items.” 37 is a Prime Number! (Tom also reminds me that it’s Pi Day too!)
Coronavirus
(1): School Closures (March 14, 2020)
Coronavirus
(2): Disease and Dictatorship (March 18, 2020)
Coronavirus (3): Love, Pets, and Booze to the Rescue! (March 22, 2020)
Coronavirus
(4): In New York State … and Beyond (March 23, 2020)
Coronavirus
(5): C’mon Ol’ Folks – Do Your Part for the Sake of the Country and Die!
(March 25, 2020)
Coronavirus
(6): Corona-Comedy – A Little Gallows Humor To Get Us Through
(March 27, 2020)
Coronavirus
(7): Corona-Chaos – A Pandemic from the Political to the Personal
(March 28, 2020)
Coronavirus
(8): A Message from Italy (March 29, 2020)
Coronavirus
(9): A Message from New York City (March 29, 2020)
Coronavirus
(10): “Standing Man” as Metaphor … or Blessed are the Healers!
(March 30, 2020)
Coronavirus
(11): “Opening Day” and Pitching In … (March 31, 2020)
Coronavirus (12): The Trials and Tribulations of Grocery Shopping … and Living in New York City (April 3, 2020)
Coronavirus
(13): New York State of Mind (April 6, 2020)
Coronavirus
(14): Numbers and Narratives (April 8, 2020)
Coronavirus
(15): What’s in a Number? (April 13, 2020)
Coronavirus
(16): Pearls Before Swine – Comic Gems In These Times
(April 16, 2020)
Coronavirus
(17): Ilana Mercer on Covidiots! (April 17, 2020)
Coronavirus
(18): Gallows Comics (April 23, 2020)
Coronavirus
(19): Reality Check (April 23, 2020)
Coronavirus
(20): A Light-Hearted Moment in the Post Office
(April 25, 2020)
Coronavirus
(21): Lockdowns, Libertarians, and Liberation (May 5, 2020)
Coronavirus
(22): Spring Cleaning (Or Three Cheers for Sanitation Workers!)
(May 8, 2020)
Coronavirus
(23): Mutual Aid During a Pandemic (or Three Cheers for the Volunteers!)
(May 11, 2020)
Coronavirus
(24): Three Cheers for the Ol’ Folks (May 12, 2020)
Coronavirus (25): Joseph “Joe Pisa” Sanfratello, RIP (May 15, 2020)
Coronavirus
(26): Gallows Humor In These Times (May 28, 2020)
Coronavirus
(27): Majority Rules NY (June 25, 2020)
Coronavirus
(28): Sweden is Not New York (July 16, 2020)
Coronavirus (29): Medical Procedures in the Age of COVID … And I’m Still Alive! (October 6, 2020)
Coronavirus
(30): “Cuomogate” and Systemic Crisis (February 19, 2021)
Coronavirus
(31): Dose #1 for a “Fake” Virus (March 18, 2021)
Coronavirus
(32): Junior’s Cheesecake (or Bring On Dose #2!)
(March 27, 2021)
Coronavirus
(33): Dose #2 and Done—Or Not! (April 15, 2021)
Coronavirus
(34): “Virtue Signaling” vs. Doing the Right Thing
(August 21, 2021)
Coronavirus
(35): The ABCs – Authority, Boosters, and Caregiving
(November 10, 2021)
Coronavirus
(36): Denialism = Death (January 5, 2022)
Coronavirus (37): An Indexical Reflection (March 14, 2022)
I will end this series with one final dose of gallows
humor, something that has marked many of the installments I posted over the
past two years. And let’s face it, we have needed some laughter to get us
through [YouTube link].
In one of my favorite comic strips, “Pearls Before Swine” by Stephan Pastis, “The Game of COVID Life” reminds us of how crazy our lives have been upended since the beginnings of this pandemic. Here’s hoping that the Finish Line is not one of closeted isolation, but a new commitment to social life, human freedom, and personal flourishing.